Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy under Spinal Anesthesia is Safe and Effective
نویسندگان
چکیده
Urinary stone disease is a common health problem and has an incidence of 4-20% worldwide [1]. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), an efficient and reliable modality in the surgical management of stone disease, has been first described by Fernström and Johansson in 1976 [2]. The popularity of this minimally invasive technique has risen gradually during the last 30 years due to its advantages such as short hospitalization time, low morbidity rates, high success rates and low costs [3]. PCNL is offered as the first choice of treatment not only for stones bigger than 2 cm, but also stones resistant or not appropriate for extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) [4]. Although this operation is generally performed under general anesthesia (GA), spinal anesthesia (SA) can also be used for appropriate patients on the discretion of the surgeon, anesthetist, and the patient. There are some studies that report PCNL performed under SA is as successful and safe as the ones performed with GA [5-10]. Herein, we report our experience for 172 PCNL cases under SA performed by a single surgeon. Materials and Methods
منابع مشابه
Results of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy under Spinal Anesthesia
Recently, there has been a considerable increase in the number of procedures carried out under regional anesthesia. However, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures are usually performed under general anesthesia. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PCNL under spinal anesthesia in patients with renal calculi. We describe our 9 years experience of performing PCNL...
متن کاملGeneral versus spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
PURPOSE To compare efficacy and complications of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS In a prospective randomized study, 110 patients were randomly assigned into two groups for PCNL; group 1 (n = 52) underwent general anesthesia and group 2 (n = 58) received spinal anesthesia. In group 1, PCNL was performed using standard te...
متن کاملComparison Between Spinal and General Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
BACKGROUND Hemodynamic stability and blood loss reduction are subjects to further consideration in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNCL). OBJECTIVES This study compared the preference of spinal anaesthesia (SA) or general anaesthesia (GA) in respect to mentioned concerns. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized clinical trial, 59 patients who underwent PCNL divided into SA...
متن کاملBilateral Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Epidural in Candidate for Lung Transplant: Case Report and Review of Literature
Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a procedure typically performed under general anesthesia (GA); however, many patients might be considered unfit for GA and locoregional anesthesia is their only chance to have the procedure done. Case Presentation: A 60-year-old Middle-Eastern female with end-stage lung disease underwent evaluation for lung transplant; she was found to have sev...
متن کاملPercutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Comparison of the Efficacies and Feasibilities of Regional and General Anesthesia
PURPOSE To compare surgical outcomes and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under regional or general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and one patients who underwent PCNL as a first-line treatment for kidney calculi between June 2004 and June 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were classified into two groups by anesthetic method: 77 were...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017